IndyDDR.com

Yeah Facebook is just one giant echo chamber.

Wearing a tie-dye T-shirt is not political activism.

Making an angry Facebook status is not political activism.

Complaining to your friends about how much you hate [insert politcal party here] is not activism.

Liking/Sharing a picture on Facebook is not activism.

Handcuffing yourself to streetlights and pouring buckets of blood on people is activism.

Fluffyumpkins wrote:People on Facebook piss me off so much. Someone will post some completely out of context political activist tripe, and hundreds of thousands of people just can't help but share it without doing as much research as a Google search to fact check.

People like to not put much effort in. They also get a good feeling from being pretentious and saying how right they are.

SoDeepPolaris wrote:

Fluffyumpkins wrote:People on Facebook piss me off so much. Someone will post some completely out of context political activist tripe, and hundreds of thousands of people just can't help but share it without doing as much research as a Google search to fact check.

People like to not put much effort in. They also get a good feeling from being pretentious and saying how right they are.

Well sure, who doesn't love being right? That's what IndyDDR is all about.

nsfw

Wow this girl looks like a delightful human being http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GBVF8Fz ... r_embedded

The way she talks so intensely (especially about the fairy) kind of makes me laugh. Merk I think you should get a butthole tattoo too. What would yours say?

gosh gee golly willikers tattoo culture is so deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep

the idea of permanently representing an idea visually on my body is hilarious to me. Any construct or idea I've had that I've felt an attachment to for longer than a fleeting moment, the way I choose to visually represent it, or how I feel it's visually represented, evolves every god damn week. To think that people are simple minded enough to represent a construct with a single, usually hilariously simple unchanging image blows my mind. Do you not learn and evolve? If so, the way you've chosen to represent said idea should eventually end up far from what you just had engraved onto your body. That's assuming your intrinsic ideals themselves don't change. Either or makes for a scary person

Potter wrote:gosh gee golly willikers tattoo culture is so deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep

the idea of permanently representing an idea visually on my body is hilarious to me. Any construct or idea I've had that I've felt an attachment to for longer than a fleeting moment, the way I choose to visually represent it, or how I feel it's visually represented, evolves every god damn week. To think that people are simple minded enough to represent a construct with a single, usually hilariously simple unchanging image blows my mind. Do you not learn and evolve? If so, the way you've chosen to represent said idea should eventually end up far from what you just had engraved onto your body. That's assuming your intrinsic ideals themselves don't change. Either or makes for a scary person

Yeah why would someone create art if their opinions, ideals or attachments ever change? Artists are such zombies.

SoDeepPolaris wrote:

Potter wrote:gosh gee golly willikers tattoo culture is so deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep

the idea of permanently representing an idea visually on my body is hilarious to me. Any construct or idea I've had that I've felt an attachment to for longer than a fleeting moment, the way I choose to visually represent it, or how I feel it's visually represented, evolves every god damn week. To think that people are simple minded enough to represent a construct with a single, usually hilariously simple unchanging image blows my mind. Do you not learn and evolve? If so, the way you've chosen to represent said idea should eventually end up far from what you just had engraved onto your body. That's assuming your intrinsic ideals themselves don't change. Either or makes for a scary person

Yeah why would someone create art if their opinions, ideals or attachments ever change? Artists are such zombies.

you're a bit smarter than that, brothel

art I and most others create is not seered ever unchanging onto my physical husk of a brain carrier, there for me, my family, my friends, and everyone to see as ever important enough to be etched onto my own body until I die. I can literally think of nothing more silly than taking a piece of art I've created and etching it into stone on myself. Especially as mine and others art is probably the single most ever changing part of us. getting a tattoo is not creating art. sorry to burst your brobubble :/

The best part about being a normal, intelligent artist, is that when I evolve and my works change (unavoidably), I can just create again. My old work, a nice waypoint in my journey of creating, is buried on youtube or my drive somewhere, for me to revisit when I choose. It's not permanently tattooed on my asshole, for me to be forced to see every morning when I wake up and look at my gooch in the mirror

tell me with a straight face you'd let a single person at that "tat expo" babysit your child

You know I'm going to agree with the Youtube comments on this one and say that that woman was probably abused in some way when she was younger. I do not know what my butt tattoo would say but it would probably be something juvenile like "PooP" or something stupid. I mean there's nothing really clever or artsy you can put on your butt hole with the sole exception being someone's face or something and your anus acting as said person's mouth.

Something like this:

Potter wrote:tell me with a straight face you'd let a single person at that "tat expo" babysit your child

At that convention? I don't know any of them so no. I have a couple of friends who are professional tattoo artists (who I would let babysit my kids) and would probably never tattoo someone's ass hole. They also wouldn't tattoo a clearly intoxicated person like that girl who has prominent daddy issues.



Personally, I think this stuff is art. I'm not talking about tweetie birds, tramp stamps or even Roll Tide Alabama elephants on some meth addict's back. You can disagree.

SDP, god damn it, I'd have sex with the tattoo lady too but I still wouldn't let them take care of my kids.

Merk wrote:SDP, god damn it, I'd have sex with the tattoo lady too but I still wouldn't let them take care of my kids.

She's an upstanding, independent woman and we were good high school friends. She was on speech team and could babysit the crap out of your kids.

BUT CONTINUE TO MAKE YOUR JUDGMENT CALLS BECAUSE SHE PUT HER MOM'S FACE ON HER GUNZ. <3

SDP would you sex her?

For the record I would not let Chad or Riot babbysit my chitlins either so don't take my judgment as a slight against her.

I am a large babby myself, it is hard to keep track of me let alone other fellow babbies