2.0.3 was the original version that I launched the IndyDDR forums with (about September 2002). It was reporting 2.0.6 when the site closed last Thanksgiving. 2.0.11 would have been current at that time. I don't remember if I had applied any patches past 2.0.6 and just not updated the version number (technical issues with the old host were at least part of the reason I closed).
There were hardly any visible or functional differences between 2.0.3 and 2.0.11...or frankly, even the version running now (which has been promptly patched, thank you very much). Other than the fact that, as MonMotha noted, I'm using a different theme now, if you thought the old site looked like an old version or not phpBB at all, it was only your perception. Although I can understand how the dark colors of the old site might give a dated impression since it's not really in style anymore.
Personally, I think your 'need's pyramid is somewhat flawed. 'Enough' sex is not a necessity to reach some of those higher tiers. In fact,' 'Enough' varies greatly between people, some people can do without it almost entirely, others thrive on it. Sex may be necessary for reproduction, but it's not necessary for many of the higher tiers, unless part of your very being, part of being self aware is having sex all the time, which for me, it is not.
I was into my cognitive needs long before I ever even came close to having sex, and having sex didn't change anything. All it did was reconfirm things I already figured out about my self.
Original Sin wrote:Personally, I think your 'need's pyramid is somewhat flawed. 'Enough' sex is not a necessity to reach some of those higher tiers. In fact,' 'Enough' varies greatly between people, some people can do without it almost entirely, others thrive on it. Sex may be necessary for reproduction, but it's not necessary for many of the higher tiers, unless part of your very being, part of being self aware is having sex all the time, which for me, it is not.
I was into my cognitive needs long before I ever even came close to having sex, and having sex didn't change anything. All it did was reconfirm things I already figured out about my self.
first of all, joke.
second, take it up with Dr. Maslow. I didnt make it.
Bring me all the bagel and muffins in the land, for tonight we drink from the keg of victory.
This is a funny topic...uh...sex? Yeah, sex is good...don't know that one form expirience yet though. ::waiting and hoping:: Someone sititng behind me said i'm nasty becasue me and my boyfriend are going to have sex someitme soon. lol
"I left the world I know to watch a kid try to put booties on a fucked up weasel...shoot me Roland, before I breed." ~Eddie Dean (dark tower by stephen king)
It's just funny hearing them bicker about it, that's all. They can look something in the face and say "This doesn't exist!" Just because it doesn't fit into their classifications. Ghosts, for example. There is scientific evidence of them, but it's only half. They can identify energy, but not awareness, and so they say it's 'not there.'
I find that funny.
"What's this giant ball of electro magnetic, negative thermal energy?"
"Absolutely nothing!"
Original Sin wrote:It's just funny hearing them bicker about it, that's all. They can look something in the face and say "This doesn't exist!" Just because it doesn't fit into their classifications. Ghosts, for example. There is scientific evidence of them, but it's only half. They can identify energy, but not awareness, and so they say it's 'not there.'
I find that funny.
"What's this giant ball of electro magnetic, negative thermal energy?"
"Absolutely nothing!"
First of all, negative thermal energy? unless youve found a way of going beyond absolute 0, there is no such thing.
Second, what scientific evidence of ghosts? Point to me one credible scientific source. just because there are unexplained phenomina dosent automatically make them ghosts.
Bring me all the bagel and muffins in the land, for tonight we drink from the keg of victory.
did you know that the salem bewitchings were because of an infected field of rye?
they were all trippin nutz on ergotamine
it's a precursor to lsd but in the natural form it's a constrictant that makes your brain shrivel up and suffocate...in small doses though it's helpful...they use it in midrin for migraine medication
sam wrote:did you know that the salem bewitchings were because of an infected field of rye?
they were all trippin nutz on ergotamine
it's a precursor to lsd but in the natural form it's a constrictant that makes your brain shrivel up and suffocate...in small doses though it's helpful...they use it in midrin for migraine medication
ummm this thread needs to get back on track with sex.
I'll start.
Sloppy style head is the best, just keep a closed but loose grip on the shaft. Spit or drool into the opening alot, and don't try to clean it up. It's a bit wet and drippy, but oOOooOOo it feels so good.
ummm this thread needs to get back on track with sex.
I'll start.
Sloppy style head is the best, just keep a closed but loose grip on the shaft. Spit or drool into the opening alot, and don't try to clean it up. It's a bit wet and drippy, but oOOooOOo it feels so good.
I give sloppy head most of the time, not like I try, I'm just uh sloppy and tend to drool way too much. But good to know that some guys like it sloppy of course I imagine that's way better than dry head b/c that's just gotta hurt.
Its been bothering me for awhile now and I must know...
Are DDR girls better in bed?
When I say ddr girl i dont just mean a girl that has played.. i mean a girl that is decent.. at least standard player preferably heavy
My three theorys are
1. she will be more limber and maybe even be "tighter"
2. because of her ability to play she has "loosened" up
3. makes no differance...its a stupid question... i still want to know your opinions though
I would test myself but i am taken.... dammit
Rules
1.You cant test the same girl... meaning if you were "dating" a girl and then you sucked her into ddr.. just doesnt work
2.one of the girls cannot be your first time... not a fair basis (optional.. say if so)
an appropriate rule would be that it is both of thier first times but that is just asking for to much
now this test is going to be a little off balance because some girls are naturally better in bed or maybe you have a personal connection that maybe made it better or worse for you
use your best judgment based solely on the actual sex
and before people ask like they did in other forums before they locked me or were of no help... im a guy, i know i may have worded things wierd, and i know this is a stupid question, and yes i really do have a girlfriend she just doesnt play ddr
